no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Humphrey Blake (abt. 1494 - 1558)

Humphrey Blake
Born about in Over Stowey, Somerset, Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 64 in Over Stowey, Somerset, Englandmap
Problems/Questions
Profile last modified | Created 30 Nov 2010
This page has been accessed 10,095 times.
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.
This person may not belong in the family group. See the text for details.

Contents

Biography

HUMPHREY1 BLAKE was born about 1494[7]

He married AGNES _____, who was buried on 24 June 1585 in Over Stowey[2]. [2, 4, 7, 14, 7, 7, 15]

Humphrey died on 19 Nov. 1558 in Over Stowey, Somerset, England, United Kingdom[2, 4] and was buried on 28 Dec. 1558 in Over Stowey[7]. [1][2] [3]


This family is supposedly descended from the Blake family of Calne, Wiltshire that dates back to the 13th century. There have been a number of lineages published on this line to the Somerset family, but they differ considerably and the connection is still in doubt. However, Humphrey's English descendants did use the arms of the Blake family of Calne[2]

It is clear that Henry Blake is the ancestor not only of the Wiltshire Blakes, but also the Blakes of Over Stowey, Somerset, although previously published lineages appear to be incorrect. The first four generations of the Blake pedigree from the 1623 visitation of Wiltshire are given below. There are perhaps three missing generations between Henry and Humphrey.

Robert Blaque or Blake of Wiltshire.
Henry Blake m. _____, daughter and heiress of _____ Dorant.

William Blake m. Eliza, daughter Thomas Power.

Henry Blake m. Margaret, daughter and heiress of Walter Bellet.
[perhaps 3 missing generations]
Humphrey Blake of Over Stowey (1494?-1558)[14]

Marriage and Children, Also See Disputed Wife

Spouse marriage dates seem to be in dispute Agnes James b. buried on 24 June 1585 in Over Stowey, Co. Somerset, England Married: October 2 1578 Over Stowey, Co. Somerset, England

Husband: Humphrey Blake and Agnes Littleton married 2 June 1519, Over, Somerset, England[4]

  1. Child: John Blakeb. about 1521[2]; bur. on 10 Dec. 1576 in Over Stowey[2]; m. JOAN
  2. Child: Alice Blake
  3. Child: Elenore Blake
  4. Child: Agnes Blake
  5. Child: Thomas Blake
  6. Child: Robert Blake

Disputed Parents

The parents of Humphrey Blake are unknown, although it seems that he descends from a Blake family of Wiltshire: see The New England Historical and Genealogical Register (Jan. 2010), p. 73.

Disputed Wife

There is no evidence that Humphrey Blake's wife was Agnes Littleton. According to the first part of the above-cited article on Humphrey Blake in the New England Historical and Genealogical Register, Humphrey had a wife Anne or Agnes (maiden name unknown), but it is unknown whether she was the mother of his children.

Will

To be buried in the parish church of Over Stowey, with such orisons and prayers, to be said and done for me at my burial and in the days of my anniversary as shall be thought most mete by my Executors, etc. To the Parson of Aisholt to pray for me 10s-. To Anstice Blake, one of the daughters of Robert Blake, for her advancement in marriage, £6 . 6 . 8. To John Blake, the elder, my son, £100. To Robert Blake, my son, £100. The Manor of Tuxwell, Somerset, to my son Robert Blake and his heirs, etc., then to Thomas, my son, then to John Blake, the younger, my son. To John Blake the elder, my son, and his heirs, lands, etc., in Bishops Lydiard. Residue to Anne my wife, and my son, John Blake the younger, Exors. Date: 11 MAY 1558 Place: Over Stowey, Co. Somerset, England, will probated.[5]

Manors and Other Estates

Three tenants in chief had land in Over Stowey in 1086, Alfred d'Epaignes, lord of Stowey, William de Falaise, lord of Stogursey, and William de Mohun, lord of Dunster.
Alfred d'Epaignes held STOWEY in 1086 in succession to Earl Harold. (fn. 35) His lands, including Over Stowey and Plainsfield and extending both sides of the Quantocks, (fn. 36) may have centred on the castle at Over Stowey, the only one known on his estate. Later the honor centred on the new castle at Nether Stowey and took its name. (fn. 37) Alfred and his immediate successors seem to have divided and subinfeudated the estate.
PLAINSFIELD, which had been held in 1066 by Edred, was occupied in 1086 by Hugh d'Epaignes under Alfred. (fn. 38) It was held of Nether Stowey honor until that was forfeited to the Crown in 1497, (fn. 39) and was held of the Crown from then until 1627 or later, in that year as of the manor of
Hampton Court. (fn. 40)
Richard son of Ralph held ½ fee at Plainsfield in 1166. (fn. 41) In 1262 Walter of Plainsfield was probably owner (fn. 42) and by 1285 had been succeeded by Adam de Chandos, probably also known as Adam of Plainsfield. (fn. 43) In 1300 Adam de Chandos settled the manor on himself for life with remainder to William de Chandos, son of Adam the elder. (fn. 44) Adam held the estate in 1303, (fn. 45) William in 1304, (fn. 46) and Adam de Chandos, possibly a third, between 1310 and 1318. (fn. 47) Another William Chandos held the manor in 1346 (fn. 48) and by 1393 had been succeeded by Joan Trowe, daughter of William Chandos. (fn. 49) Joan's son Thomas Trowe seems to have been in possession by 1402, although his mother may still have been alive. (fn. 50) Thomas continued in possession until 1431 or later (fn. 51) but by 1447 had been succeeded by John Trowe. (fn. 52)
In 1489-90 the manor was settled on Hugh Trowe and Elizabeth Malet, widow of Thomas Ashley, probably for their marriage. (fn. 53) Elizabethsurvived her husband but died in 1493, when her husband's brother Thomas was heir. (fn. 54) Thomas was involved in the rebellion of 1497 against
Henry VII and was attainted in 1504. Plainsfield manor was granted to Sir John Williams in 1506, (fn. 55) and on his death two years later it passed to his son Reginald, then a minor. (fn. 56) Reginald died in 1559 leaving sons John (d. 1560), Nicholas, and Richard. (fn. 57) Nicholas and Richard both died in 1568 without male issue and the manor reverted to the Crown. (fn. 58)
By 1601 Humphrey Blake (d. 1620), whose family had been tenants of the demesne probably from the mid 16th century, had acquired the manor. (fn.59) Humphrey's son Humphrey and their kinsman Robert Blake (d. 1627) seem to have shared the estate. Robert left a son, also Robert, a minor, (fn. 60) but in 1639 (fn. 61) the manor was held by the younger Humphrey's son or grandson, also Humphrey, who was succeeded in 1665 (fn. 62) by his son John. (fn. 63) John Blake died in 1695 and his son, also John, in 1704. (fn. 64) A third John Blake, son of the last, by his will of 1722 left the manor in trust for his nephew John Rich. John Rich by will dated 1747 gave Plainsfield to his brother Nathaniel who with his wife Joan sold the manor in 1761 to John Perceval, earl of Egmont (d. 1770). (fn. 65) The manor thereafter descended like Enmore; the lordship was not, however, mentioned in the sale of the estate in 1833. (fn. 66)
Plainsfield Court- The Blake Home
Over Stowey ?mostly belonged to the Blakes is pleasantly situated on the eastern side of the Quantock hills.? The church is a plain structure, consisting of a nave, chancel, and north aisle, with a tower at the west end, sixty feet in height, containing five bells. the parish registers, which begin in 1558, contain numerous entries of the family of Blake, and their collaterals, and some monumental tablets of the family yet remain.
The manor house of Plainsfield, long the residence of the Blakes, stands about a mile from the church, and affords a good specimen of a gentlemen?s residence in the early part of the sixteenth century, its massive walls, arched entrance porch, and general construction bearing evidence of its antiquity.
Plainsfield Court is a medieval farmhouse (Listed Grade II) with a self-contained wing and a range of traditional outbuildings set in the Quantock Hills with magnificent views across to the Bristol Channel and Somerset Levels. The Plainsfield Blakes came from Calne, Wiltshire, and settled in Somerset towards the end of the 15th Century. In the great hall, over the fire-place, are the sculptured arms of the family, as borne by their progenitors in Whiltshire and Hampshire. A venrable chesnut tree overspreads the building, and adds much to the picturesqueness of the spot. Many years ago the estate passed from the Blakes, and the mansion is now occupied by a tenant farmer of the Earl of Egmont.?

Research Notes

The English ancestry of William Blake, of Dorchester, MA was printed in the Search series, volume 17, pp. 19-21, and his line has been traced back to Humphrey Blake, who was buried in Over Stowey, Somerset in 1558. Now there is evidence he may have been born about 1537, in nearby Bridgwater, Somerset. A case has been found concerning tithes payable by John Rowswelll, in respect of which evidence was given on 9 Dec. 1567 by Humphrey Blake of Bridgwater, Husbandman, "where he had lived from his birth, aged 30 years or thereabouts" (ref. Somerset Record Office. D/D/Cd 12). This witness was therefore born at Bridgwater c. 1537.
This is the earliest evidence so far discovered for what is presumed to be the family of the Blakes later of Ov er Stowey, as the forename Humphrey was persistent on this branch. This is clearly too early for parish registers to be of help and a search through the unindexed Bridgwater borough records for the early 16th century was indicated. Unfortunately, although Bush has consulted the borough catalogues and looked at a number of rentals, surveys, deeds and leases, he has found no further reference to the surname. In itself this proves nothing. The fact that the above Humphrey was described as a husbandman suggests a relatively lowly status, which might in turn explain the dearth of references. Bush says he could pursue this further but he feels that additional work would not be justified at this stage.[6]
Humphrey Blake was in Somerset in the early 1500's and founded that county's Blake family. He died C1588, and is buried on 28th December 1588 in Over Stowey, Somerset, England. In the early 1500's, he purchased large estates in Over Stowey, where he acquired the Plainsfield Manor (now Spaxton) and lived in the manor house, now called the "Court House", which still stands today. He became Lord of the Manor of Plainfield, situated on the east side of Quantock Hills, it consists of 4 hamlets of march Hills, Addiscombe, Ely Green, and Plainfield. the manor house (Plainfield) has the Blake arms over the fireplace in the great hall. In 1555, Humphrey Blake added the adjorning manor of Tuxwell. Arms of the Wiltshire Blakes: Argent, a chevron between three garbs sable. Crest: On a chapeau gules, turned up ermine, a martlet, argent. This coat of arms was borne by Admiral Robert Blake on his ships, as his personal coat of arms since he is the son of Humphrey XII [Robert X] and great nephew of John the elder, Robert and John the both being son of Humphrey IX.His will was dated 19th November 1558 and proved 11th May 1559 Over-Stowey, co. Somerset, England.[7]
Humphrey, son of William Blake, removed early in the sixteenth century to Over Stowey, Somersetshire, and became lord of the manor of Plainfield, in that parish, adding the adjoining manor of Tuxwell, bought in 1555 of George Sydenham. Over Stowey was owned in large part by the Blake family for two centuries. The manor house has the Blake coat-of-arms over the fireplace in the great hall. Humphrey died in 1558 and was buried December 28, in Over Stowey. His will is dated November 19, 1558, and proved May 11, 1559. His widow Agnes was buried June 24, 1585. Children: John, the elder, Robert; Thomas; John, the younger; Agnes; Eleanor; Alice.

Sources

  1. Find A Grave: Memorial #100234277
  2. "He died at Over Stowey, Somerset, 19 November 1558, according to his inquisition post mortem."
  3. Inquisition post mortem of Humphrey Blake, 20 September 1559, C 142/119, The National Archives.
  4. #S460: vol. 14; p.56
  5. #S460: vol. 14; p.56
  6. #S460: vol. 26, pt. 2; pp. 12-13
  7. Cutter, William Richard. New England Families Genealogical and Memorial: Third Series, Volume III. 1915. Reprint, Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc., 1996.

  • [1]
  • 1. Burton W. Spear, Search for the Passengers of the Mary and John - 1630 (Toledo, Ohio: B.W. Spear, 1985-1992), 17:128.2. Ibid., 17:19.3. Ibid., 17:20,128.4. Ibid., 25:13.
  • 5. New England Historical and Genealogical Register 163 (2009): 199.6. Ibid.: 202.7. Ibid.: 87.8. Ibid.: 88-91.9. Ibid.: 91.10. Ibid.: 91, 96.11. Ibid.: 92.12. Ibid.: 93.13. Ibid.: 96.
  • 14. New England Historical and Genealogical Register 164 (2010): 73.
  • 15. Paul C. Reed, "Two Somerby Frauds or "Placing the Flesh on the Bones", The American Genealogist, vol. 74. (1999): pages 15-30. [https://www.americanancestors.org/DB283/i/13222/15/24783173 AmericanAncestors.org link.
  • 16. Francis E. Blake, "The Blake Family in England," New England Historical and Genealogical Register 45 (1891): 35-38.
  • S460 Title: Search for the Passengers of the Mary & John 1630 Abbreviation: Mary & John series Author: Mary & John Clearing House Publication: Burton W. Spear, Toledo, OH, 1990
  • Stott, Clifford L., Humphrey Blake (1494?–1558) and His Descendants in New England and South Carolina: Blake, Richards, Selleck, Torrey, and Wolcott, The New England Historical & Genealogical Register (NEHGS, Boston, Mass., 2009) Vol. 163, WN 650, Page 87.




Is Humphrey your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Humphrey's DNA have taken a DNA test. Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Images: 1
Ancestral search
Ancestral search



Comments: 17

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
There is a child missing in the Biography section - John Blake "The Younger" [Blake-6777]. born ~1533 died in 1571 and married Christian Jugg. The link is added in the top section but missing in the bottom discussion section. I am unable to edit due to the restictions...
posted by Barbara Marshik
edited by Barbara Marshik
I believe this is Humphrey William Blake, Lord of Plainsfield Manor born 1500 and died Dec 28th 1558. He was born in Hampshire.

The book The Ancient Borough of Bridgwater in the county of Somerset by Rev Arthur Herbert Powell. Gives a record of this period. The Humphrey Blake who died in 1619 was the grandson . Who's father was John The Elder Blake and married to Agnes James.

posted by David Inder
Humfry Blake died March 10, 1619. He is buried in Over Stowey, Somerset, England. I have visited his gravesite inside the church several times. I have also visited the plantation of his descendant, Provincial Governor Joseph Blake, in Hollywood (Charleston), S.C. There is a museum in Bridgewater, Somerset, England named after the Blake family. It is close to Bristol, Cheddar, Exeter, and other popular places. Oh yes, I have also visited Robecca Blake's birthplace in Massachusetts as well as the place for the Salem witch trials where she was convicted. She wasn't executed as they thought she was too crazy to do what she had been accused of doing. her son was also accused of practicing witchcraft. He was accused by his mom, Robecca.
posted by Larry Singer
Burial record: Somerset : Over Stowey : St Peter and Paul : Parish Register : "Parish Register" database, FreeREG (https://www.freereg.org.uk/search_records/5818ea94e93790ec75c72d9e : viewed 20 Dec 2022) burial Humfry Blake 28 Dec 1558
posted by Steven Losey
Sorry Steven. The photos are associated with Humfrey Blake 1553-1619. He was married to Agnes who was buried outside of the church. Humfrey's father was John "the Elder" Blake. He was married to Christian Jugg. I am a descendant grandson of Christian Jugg and my wife is a descendant granddaughter of John "The Elder." There are lots of interesting direct line persons of interest in the family. For example, Robekah Blake Eames (Salem witch), Admiral Robert Blake known as "General of the Sea" and "Father of the Royal Navy." and his nephew Joseph Blake, Governor of Charles Town (Charleston) Carolina Province and Governor of the Province of Carolina from 1696-1700.
posted by Larry Singer
John Blake The Elder married Joan / Jane (possibly Rawson) while John Blake The Younger married Christian Jugg. Therefore you are related to the Younger John Blake. See the following references: Stott, Clifford. Humphrey Blake (1494?–1558) and His Descendants. in NEHGR, Volume 163 (2009), pages 85-97, 199-211, 278-295, and Volume 164 (2010), pages 63-72 for clear details on the relationships.
posted by Barbara Marshik
Humfrey Blake, of Over Stowey, Somerset died in 1619. It says so on his headstone that is located inside the church. I have been there on occasions and I am a witness. It shows 1619 on the photograph. It also says the his wife Agnes is buried there as well. Humfrey Blake died in 1619. The day of the month was signified as "XXX".
posted by Larry Singer
That was this Humfrey Humphrey Blake (abt.1553-bef.1620)
posted by Steven Losey
I don't understand. Are you asking a question or what? His name on the tombstone is Humfry.
posted by Larry Singer
What I am saying this Humfrey was buried 28 Dec 1558, Somerset : Over Stowey : St Peter and Paul : Parish Register : "Parish Register" database, FreeREG (https://www.freereg.org.uk/search_records/5818ea94e93790ec75c72d9e : viewed 20 Dec 2022) burial Humfry Blake 28 Dec 1558,not March 20, 1619. Somerset : Over Stowey : St Peter and Paul : Parish Register : "Parish Register" database, FreeREG (https://www.freereg.org.uk/search_records/5818ea97e93790ec75c73110 : viewed 20 Dec 2022) burial Humfry Blake 20 Mar 1619/20 (His Nephew)
posted by Steven Losey
edited by Steven Losey
So I'm curious all the research im finding says he died around 1620 the marker says 1619 why does the site have it 1598?
posted by Jason Blake
I was in the church in Over Stowie. It is printed 1619 on the stone.
posted by Larry Singer
John Blake the Elder had a son he named Humphrey. This Humphrey died in 1619/20. See the articles written by Clifford Stott on Humphrey Blake (1494?–1558) and His Descendants. in NEHGR, Volume 163 (2009), pages 85-97, 199-211, 278-295, and Volume 164 (2010), pages 63-72.
posted by Barbara Marshik
Sorry for the long comment, but here's a recent (today, January 30th 2021) search result from our family historian:

I’ve been piddling around with my Ancestry.com membership and thought I’d see if it had anything on the Blake ancestors.  I already had Spencer and his father, John Authur Blake.


Much to my surprise, it had his parents who were John Hamilton Blake 1844 to 1919 and Emma Berryman 1845 to 1923.  They were from Kentucky, but ended up living in Missouri.  There are records showing him as a private in the Missouri State Militia during the civil war (on the union side).


John Hamilton’s parents were David Blake, 1812 to 1908 and Nancy Shepard, 1812 to 1872.


David’s parents were Samuel Blake Jr. 1788 to 1863 and Amy, 1793 to 1860.


Samuel Jr.’s parents were Samuel Blake Sr., 1735 to 1807 and Amy Reddick, 1735 to 1818.  It shows they got two land grants in Kentucky.


Samuel Sr.’s parents were Thomas Blake, 1710 to 1789 and Margaret, 1712 to 1746.


Thomas’s parents were William Blake, 1677 to 1746 and Mary Sessums, 1685 to 1742.


William’s parents were Thomas Blake Sr., 1644 to 1707 and Alice Champion, 1646 to 1710.  They lived in colonial Virginia.  


Last night, it just showed Unknown for his parents.  That was further back than anyone else in the family tree I have.  Then today, I plugged in the information I had on this Thomas Blake Sr. and found six more generations.


Thomas Sr.’s parents were Edward Blake, 1626 to 1692 and Patience Pope, 1632 to 1690.  She was born in Sumersetshire, England and her parents brought her over here when she was two.  If the dates are right, she had her first baby (your ancestor) when she was 12.  Edward was born in Pitminster, Somerset, England and his parents brought him over in 1635 when he was 9.  The ship was the Mary and John.   That Edward must have been a stud.  It shows they had at least 20 children including many who were twins.  Coincidentally, he died on his birthday but that might have been someone’s typo.  They were living in Massachusetts. 


Edward’s parents back in Pitminster, Somerset, England were William Blake II, 1594 to 1663 and Agnes Thorne Band, 1593 to 1678.


His parents were William Giles Blake I, 1564. To 1642 and Dorothy Tweedy, 1572 to 1647 and also lived in Somerset, England.


His parents were Lord John R Blake III, 1522 to 1576 and Lady Mabel Coverte, 1530 to 1595. (Somerset, England)


His parents were Lord John Humphrey Blake II, 1494 to 1558 and Lady Agnes Anna Rawson, 1500 to 1585.  (Somerset, England)


His father was John Blake the 1st presumably born around 1470. (Somerset, England)


That pretty well takes the cake.  18 generations from Zack and Lauren’s children and Amorie all the way up thru this last John Blake who was born around 1470,  before America was even discovered.  And having Lord this and Lady that as well.     


Thought you’d be interested.

Jay

posted by Aaron Blake
Geni claims his father was John Blake, b1429.
posted by Steve Selbrede
Blake-258 was the son of and father of Blake-291, removed parents.
posted by Kirk Hess
does this line go to Philadelphia,PA in the early 1700s? if so I'm in
posted by Robert Blake

Featured Auto Racers: Humphrey is 22 degrees from Jack Brabham, 24 degrees from Rudolf Caracciola, 18 degrees from Louis Chevrolet, 19 degrees from Dale Earnhardt, 35 degrees from Juan Manuel Fangio, 17 degrees from Betty Haig, 22 degrees from Arie Luyendyk, 19 degrees from Bruce McLaren, 19 degrees from Wendell Scott, 20 degrees from Kat Teasdale, 17 degrees from Dick Trickle and 26 degrees from Maurice Trintignant on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.

B  >  Blake  >  Humphrey Blake

Categories: Horatio Gates Somerby Fraud | Estimated Birth Date | Uncertain Family