Husband John Kelley married about 1640 in New England but no name is given for the wife. [1]
Children:
Sarah, b. 12 Feb 1640/41 in Newbury, Essex Co, MA; d 25 Dec 1713 in Rowley, Essex, MA; m. 15 Apr 1659 in Rowley, Essex Co, MA to Thomas BURPEE; had issue...
? Mary, b 12 Feb 1640/1 twin, in Newbury, Essex Co MA [reportedly d 1685 in Woodbridge, Middlesex Co., NJ; m. 1666 to John (BEL)CONGER; had issue...
+John, b 2 July 1642 in Newbury MA. Married 1) Sarah Knight 2) Lydia widow Ames....
Research Notes
Previous versions of this profile included marriages to John Barnett[2].
and Thomas Robbins[3], but those marriages were to different women.
There do not seem to be any sources for her other than the Torrey citation which does not include a first name or maiden name.
It's possible that Mary is buried at the Rowley Burial Ground, Main Street, Rowley, Essex, Massachusetts, as that is believed to be where John Kelly is buried, but there don't seem to be any records to confirm or refute that.
↑
"Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001"
citing Digital film/folder number: 007009706_003_M99N-K1G; FHL microfilm: 877468; Image number: 61; Packet letter: C; Indexing batch: M03766-5
FamilySearch Record: Q29G-G4CB (accessed 14 May 2024)
FamilySearch Image: 3QS7-9979-W7NW
Mary Bishop marriage to Thomas Robbins on 11 Mar 1674 in Salem, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colony.
Acknowledgments
This person was created through the import of Holman Family Tree.ged on 06 March 2011.
Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
No commoner, I repeat "NO ONE," born in England in 1619 or thereabouts, had multiple given names. It was illegal to christen a child that way. Thus there is no way that any
"Mary Nancy Bishop" existed at that time. Any such person could have been "Mary" or "Nancy," but not both. Further, the vitals above say that "Mary Nancy" was born and christened in Kingston, Surry in 1619, but then she is linked to a set of parents who had all their children christened in Bridport, Dorset - a VERY long hike from Surry! I don't even know that her maiden name was "Bishop." Can someone help me out here? I have zero evidence for that proposition.
Unknown-226426 and Bishop-5065 appear to represent the same person because: I believe this is the same person... same dates, same husband, same children.....
Featured Auto Racers:
Mary is
19 degrees from Jack Brabham, 23 degrees from Rudolf Caracciola, 15 degrees from Louis Chevrolet, 13 degrees from Dale Earnhardt, 32 degrees from Juan Manuel Fangio, 17 degrees from Betty Haig, 19 degrees from Arie Luyendyk, 18 degrees from Bruce McLaren, 16 degrees from Wendell Scott, 19 degrees from Kat Teasdale, 15 degrees from Dick Trickle and 20 degrees from Maurice Trintignant
on our single family tree.
Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
"Mary Nancy Bishop" existed at that time. Any such person could have been "Mary" or "Nancy," but not both. Further, the vitals above say that "Mary Nancy" was born and christened in Kingston, Surry in 1619, but then she is linked to a set of parents who had all their children christened in Bridport, Dorset - a VERY long hike from Surry! I don't even know that her maiden name was "Bishop." Can someone help me out here? I have zero evidence for that proposition.
I checked ancestry trees - they call her Mary Nancy and her father is a John Bishop https://www.ancestry.com/family-tree/person/tree/22070951/person/312051852446
Please detach from Thomas and Avis unless you have some accurate source.