Different spellings of last names - ANSWERED [closed]

+7 votes
108 views

I am having problems knowing how to list members of a family who frequently have their names spelt in several different ways on official documents. I have read some of the posts on the same subject which suggest using the earliest written record, but in the family I'm looking at all siblings would have differently spelt last names

In the 1830s-40s baptism register of his children, the father's last name is spelt differently each time a child is baptised, for all his children. These are also the earliest records for the father, so I also don't know which spelling to use for him. Subsequent census records and other official records all use different spellings too. 

I intend listing them as per the individual different spelling for each sibling, and as per the earliest child's baptism for the father, but also add all the alternative spellings to each entry as a 'confusion warning'.

Is this correct?

I have not yet added all these earlier siblings, but is it best to use the spelling on the earliest record as described above (which would give them all differently spelt names, often also different to subsequent spellings) or should I choose the most used spelling and use the same spelling for each sibling (still with a 'confusion warning' listing all the other spellings?

In alphabetical order, some of the spellings found for the family I'm looking at include: Bagaley, Baggaley, Baggarley, Baggley, Baggulay, Bagguley, Bagley.

I would appreciate any advice. Thanks.


The answers provided by Joe Murray and Ellen Smith where just what I was looking for and provide a link to extensive and correct information about the Wiki Tree standards for completing name fields, and precise information about recording different surnames.   

In my particular case, and to answer my own question, (apart from obvious spelling errors or obvious mistakes) I need to 

  • Use the baptism surname as 'Last Name at Birth'
  • Use the death or burial surname as 'Current Last Name', 
  • Use all other spellings of the surname separated with commas as 'Other Last Name(s)', 
  • and add a '''Research Note''' explaining the reasons for the different names.

Sorted. My thanks go to Joe Murray for providing the link to the Wiki Tree Name Standards, and to Ellen Smith for the reminder that the '''Other Last Names(s)''' box takes more than one name.

closed with the note: Answerd correctly and comprehensively
in WikiTree Help by Richard Underwood G2G6 (8.3k points)
closed by Richard Underwood
Some projects have rules on ow to handle this situation, but I don't believe there is WikiTree-wide standard. Recording each child's LNAB as the name on their earliest record is very sensible.

IMO, the single most important thing is to include all of the names (for example, the LNABs for all of the siblings, plus any names the person was recorded with later in life) in the name fields in the profile data section. That way, anybody searching for the person ought to be able to find them. You can put multiple last names in the Other Last Names field. Separate them with commas.

1 Answer

+10 votes
 
Best answer

Richard,

Your proposal is in line with WikiTree standards, found here:

Help:Name Fields

by Joe Murray G2G6 Mach 8 (82.0k points)
selected by Richard Underwood

Related questions

+4 votes
0 answers
+6 votes
1 answer
+2 votes
1 answer
+7 votes
0 answers
+2 votes
1 answer
+5 votes
2 answers
+4 votes
1 answer
+9 votes
2 answers
320 views asked May 25, 2021 in WikiTree Tech by Rick Morley G2G6 Pilot (167k points)

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...