no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Parker (1583 - 1638)

John Parker
Born in Browsholme, Wiltshire, Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 1601 in Little Norton, Derbyshire, Englandmap
Husband of — married 2 Jul 1606 in Norton, Derbyshire, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Father of , , , and
Died at age 55 in Derbyshire, Englandmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Barbara M private message [send private message] and John Putnam private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 8 Apr 2011
This page has been accessed 3,212 times.

Contents

Biography

John was born in 1583 in Browsholme, Wiltshire, England.[citation needed]

Note - The pedigree of Parker of Woodthorpe and Little Norton shows him as "of Little Norton" Derbyshire,[1] and there is a baptism on 4 September 1575, the date given in the pedigree.[2]

Marriage

Husband: John Parker
Wife: Dyonysia Bright
Marriage:
Date: 1601
Place: Little Norton, Derbyshire, England[3]
Husband: John Parker
Wife: Jane Bates
Marriage:
Date: 2 JUL 1606
Child: John Parker
Child: Thomas Parker
Child: William Parker

Burial

Burial:
Place: Derbyshire, England

Sources

  1. ↑ Pedigree of Parker of Woodthorpe, Pedigrees of the county families of Yorkshire, vol 2, Foster, Joseph, Publication date 1874, https://archive.org/details/pedigreesofcount02fost/page/n67/mode/2up
  2. ↑ Derbyshire : Norton : St James : Other Transcript : "Parish Register" database, FreeREG (https://www.freereg.org.uk/search_records/60327e54f493fd703fdd9cce : viewed 13 Feb 2024) baptism John Parker 04 Sep 1575
  3. ↑ "England Marriages, 1538–1973", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NKY8-LWT : 13 March 2020), John Parker, 1601.
  • Source: Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members.
Source
Text: Manuscript
Text: [Hugh Darrell Miller, comp.]
Text: Genealogy: Ethel Peters Miller/Hugh Darrell Miller
Text: 1985
Text: copy in possession of author



See also:





Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships. Paternal line Y-chromosome DNA test-takers: Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 9

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Helen (Coleman) Ford
Parker-27029 and Parker-3883 appear to represent the same person because: These men have the same spouses and death locations and match this pedigree.https://archive.org/details/pedigreesofcount02fost

The more recent profile has a more detailed bio. The earlier profile has a birthplace and date which don't match those in the bio (and only Brownholme I can find is in Lancashire not Wiltshire. The mother linked to the earlier profile is not evidenced.

posted by Helen (Coleman) Ford
Barbara M
Parker-27029 and Parker-3883 are not ready to be merged because: conflicting details, including parents, need to be tidied
posted by Barbara M
Lee-5956 Robin Lee
It has now been two months since this post. I am reproposing the merge and would ask someone else to take on the responsibilty.
posted by Robin Lee
Lee-5956 Robin Lee
Parker-27029 and Parker-3883 appear to represent the same person because: same wives per biography, birth needs validation as well as parents
posted by Robin Lee
Chapel-160 Claire (Chapel) Nava
Parker-27029 and Parker-3883 are not ready to be merged because: It looks as though there are two separate men, and someone has conflated them in later life. What are your thoughts?
posted by Claire (Chapel) Nava
Lee-5956 Robin Lee
Not sure how you came to that conclusion. Park-3883 indicates that the birth shown is incorrect and why it is incorrect, there is no source for the mother shown, sources indicate they are the same person.
posted by Robin Lee
Lee-5956 Robin Lee
As the lead of the Arborist project, you are the person that set these as unmerged matches, and the guidelines indicate that this means you will be working the issue, what is you plan? Let me know, as these profiles have sat as unmerged matches for a long time.
posted by Robin Lee
Helen (Coleman) Ford
Browsholme is in Lancashire, not Wiltshire. https://browsholme.com/. This was the home of this man

EDIT missed an important NOT ( not home of this man) It was the home of a different Parker family.

According to the cited pedigree this man was of Little Norton, Lancashire and baptised in Norton in 1575. This matches the Freereg reference on profile.

According to the pedigree he was the son of John Parker and Cecily also of Little Norton.

posted by Helen (Coleman) Ford
edited by Helen (Coleman) Ford
[Living Schmeeckle]
I don't see any evidence for the parents of this John Parker; the alleged parents lived in another county.
posted by [Living Schmeeckle]

Unmerged matches › John Parker (1575-1638)
Rejected matches › John Parker (abt.1525-abt.1581) › John Parker (bef.1825-) › John Packer (1583-) › John Barker (1585-)

Featured Asian and Pacific Islander connections: John is 23 degrees from 今上 天皇, 19 degrees from Adrienne Clarkson, 21 degrees from Dwight Heine, 23 degrees from Dwayne Johnson, 19 degrees from Tupua Tamasese Lealofioaana, 17 degrees from Stacey Milbern, 18 degrees from Sono Osato, 31 degrees from 乾隆 愛新覺羅, 20 degrees from Ravi Shankar, 23 degrees from Taika Waititi, 17 degrees from Penny Wong and 15 degrees from Chang Bunker on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.

P  >  Parker  >  John Parker